Steps for an after action review: [1]
Charasteristics
|
Content
|
Definition
|
After Action Review.
|
Steps |
- Invite the right people-Appoint a facilitator-Create the right climate
- Define the meeting objectives and deliverables of the project
- Define what was supposed to happen in the project
- Resume what actually happened, what went well and why?
- Define what could have gone better and share learning advices for the future
- Ensure every participant in the meeting is fully heard before leaving the meeting
- Record and share important lessons learnt
|
Facilitator role |
Leadership role
- To focus on providing a direction to the group when the leader fails to fulfill their role
- To stimulate and encourage constructive debate between group members
- To support members of the group, helping them to bring information, and to build new ideas
- To participate when the group is interacting poorly or in the wrong direction, by promoting new discussion
- To promote team building in a cohesive, interactive, and productive way
Referee role
- To regulate and maintain order of the group discussion, discouraging participants from talking at the same time
- To protect members, and ensure that all contributions to the discussion are treated equally
- To deal with problems, and to control people within the group, allowing everyone to participate freely
- To manage the time, and adhere to the meeting timetable ensuring completion of the agenda
Neutral role
- The facilitator is neutral, and pragmatic, because he takes a detached look at the discussion
- He encourages feedback, to promote discussion of each point of the meeting
|
References
- ↑ www.odi.org.uk (18 August 2008), [1] (21 July 2008), www.daretoshare.ch (18 August 2008), www.nlink.com (18 August 2008), www.waterisac.org/epa (18 August 2008),
|