Difference between revisions of "Impartiality"
From Learning and training wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Term|IMPARTIALITY|An [[Evaluation|evaluation]]stance that implies a lack of preference by the [[Evaluator|evaluator]] for the values or aims of any interest group in a programme or project and expressing a formal disinterest in respect of the programme or project [[Outcomes|outcomes]]. Impartiality requires that the evaluator set aside personal [[Judgement|judgment]] to focus on feeding the judgment of participants.<ref>Saville Kushner, in Mathison, Sandra. Encyclopaedia of Evaluation, pp 194, Ed. University of British Columbia. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.</ref>}} | + | {{Term|IMPARTIALITY|An [[Evaluation|evaluation]] stance that implies a lack of preference by the [[Evaluator|evaluator]] for the values or aims of any interest group in a programme or project and expressing a formal disinterest in respect of the programme or project [[Outcomes|outcomes]]. Impartiality requires that the evaluator set aside personal [[Judgement|judgment]] to focus on feeding the judgment of participants.<ref>Saville Kushner, in Mathison, Sandra. Encyclopaedia of Evaluation, pp 194, Ed. University of British Columbia. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.</ref>}} |
Latest revision as of 16:15, 21 July 2011
 IMPARTIALITY |
| An evaluation stance that implies a lack of preference by the evaluator for the values or aims of any interest group in a programme or project and expressing a formal disinterest in respect of the programme or project outcomes. Impartiality requires that the evaluator set aside personal judgment to focus on feeding the judgment of participants.[1] |
References
- ↑ Saville Kushner, in Mathison, Sandra. Encyclopaedia of Evaluation, pp 194, Ed. University of British Columbia. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.