Difference between revisions of "Open ECBCheck"
From Learning and training wiki
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Open ECBCheck has been developed through a participative process initiated by InWent. This interagency collaboration involves about 25 international capacity building agencies (among which 8 UN agencies). | Open ECBCheck has been developed through a participative process initiated by InWent. This interagency collaboration involves about 25 international capacity building agencies (among which 8 UN agencies). | ||
− | ==Criteria== | + | =='''Criteria'''== |
The Open ECBCheck is based on a self-assessment followed by a peer-review performed by external agencies (see Process for more information), both guided by a set of criteria. | The Open ECBCheck is based on a self-assessment followed by a peer-review performed by external agencies (see Process for more information), both guided by a set of criteria. | ||
The label has two different sets of criteria for the evaluation of a programme or an institution. | The label has two different sets of criteria for the evaluation of a programme or an institution. |
Revision as of 17:00, 20 January 2011
![]() |
Open ECBCheck is a low cost accreditation and quality improvement scheme for E-learning Programmes and institutions in international Capacity Building. It supports capacity building organizations to measure how successful their e-learning programmes are and allows for continuous improvement through self-assessment, peer collaboration and benchmarking. The Open ECBCheck provides a quality label valid for three years, after this period program and institution can re-apply in order to re-obtain the label. Certified institutions and programs also commit in reporting improvements made after having received the certification. Open ECBCheck has been developed through a participative process initiated by InWent. This interagency collaboration involves about 25 international capacity building agencies (among which 8 UN agencies). CriteriaThe Open ECBCheck is based on a self-assessment followed by a peer-review performed by external agencies (see Process for more information), both guided by a set of criteria. The label has two different sets of criteria for the evaluation of a programme or an institution.
Set of Criteria for a Program / Course Certification:The program/course quality criteria are divided into seven main areas:
Set of Criteria for an Institutional CertificationThe institution quality criteria are organised into four main areas:
|
References
- ↑ OPEN ECBCheck | Quality Label for Capacity Building http://www.qualityfoundation.org/openecbcheck/ (20 October 2010)