Difference between revisions of "Problem Tree Analysis"
From Learning and training wiki
(New page: {{Term|Problem Tree Analysis|Problem Tree Analysis is a tool that helps to identify the negative aspects of an existing situation and establish the “cause and effect” relationships bet...) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The problem tree should be developed as a participatory group activity. 6 to 8 people is often a good group size. It is important to ensure that groups are structured in ways that enable particular viewpoints, especially those of the less powerful, to be expressed.<ref>NZAID Tools, “Logical Framework Approach”, http://nzaidtools.nzaid.govt.nz/logical-framework-approach/annex-2-problem-tree-analysis (22 October, 2009)</ref> | The problem tree should be developed as a participatory group activity. 6 to 8 people is often a good group size. It is important to ensure that groups are structured in ways that enable particular viewpoints, especially those of the less powerful, to be expressed.<ref>NZAID Tools, “Logical Framework Approach”, http://nzaidtools.nzaid.govt.nz/logical-framework-approach/annex-2-problem-tree-analysis (22 October, 2009)</ref> | ||
− | # Brainstorm problems and identify the focal problem as an individual starter problem. Write it on a card or “Post-it”. | + | #Brainstorm problems and identify the focal problem as an individual starter problem. Write it on a card or “Post-it”. This first step can either be completely open (no pre-conceived notions as to what stakeholder’s priority concerns/ problems might be), or more directed, through specifying a “known” high order problem or objective based on preliminary analysis of existing information and initial stakeholder consultations. |
− | This first step can either be completely open (no pre-conceived notions as to what stakeholder’s priority concerns/ problems might be), or more directed, through specifying a “known” high order problem or objective based on preliminary analysis of existing information and initial stakeholder consultations. | + | |
# Brainstorm all of the other problems associated with the focal problem and write each problem on a separate card or “Post-it”. | # Brainstorm all of the other problems associated with the focal problem and write each problem on a separate card or “Post-it”. | ||
− | # Establish a hierarchy of causes and effects. | + | # Establish a hierarchy of causes and effects. Problems which are directly causing the focal problem are put below, and problems which are direct effects of the focal problem are put above. |
− | Problems which are directly causing the focal problem are put below, and problems which are direct effects of the focal problem are put above. | + | # For each problem, ask the question “What causes this problem?” Write the causes on separate cards and place them below the problem they cause. If there are two or more causes of a problem, and one is not the cause of the other, then place them on the same level. |
− | # For each problem, ask the question “What causes this problem?” Write the causes on separate cards and place them below the problem they cause. | + | |
− | If there are two or more causes of a problem, and one is not the cause of the other, then place them on the same level. | + | |
# Connect the problems with case-effect arrows – clearly showing key links. | # Connect the problems with case-effect arrows – clearly showing key links. | ||
− | # Review the problem tree and verify its validity and completeness. | + | # Review the problem tree and verify its validity and completeness. Ask yourself/ the group – “Are there important problems that have not been mentioned yet?” If so, specify the problems and include them at an appropriate place in the tree. |
− | Ask yourself/ the group – “Are there important problems that have not been mentioned yet?” If so, specify the problems and include them at an appropriate place in the tree. | + | |
# Copy the problem tree onto a sheet of paper to keep as a record, and distribute (as appropriate) for further comment/ information. | # Copy the problem tree onto a sheet of paper to keep as a record, and distribute (as appropriate) for further comment/ information. | ||
+ | |||
The heart of the exercise is the discussion, debate and dialogue that is generated as factors are arranged and re-arranged, often forming sub-dividing roots and branches.<ref>Overseas Development Institute (ODI), http://www.odi.org.uk/RAPID/Tools/Toolkits/Communication/Problem_tree.html (22 October, 2009)</ref> | The heart of the exercise is the discussion, debate and dialogue that is generated as factors are arranged and re-arranged, often forming sub-dividing roots and branches.<ref>Overseas Development Institute (ODI), http://www.odi.org.uk/RAPID/Tools/Toolkits/Communication/Problem_tree.html (22 October, 2009)</ref> | ||
Revision as of 16:46, 27 October 2009
Problem Tree Analysis |
Problem Tree Analysis is a tool that helps to identify the negative aspects of an existing situation and establish the “cause and effect” relationships between the identified problems.[1] |
Why to use it?[2]
- The problem can be broken down into manageable and definable chunks. This enables a clearer prioritization of factors and helps focus objectives;
- There is more understanding of the problem and its often interconnected and even contradictory causes. This is often the first step in finding win-win solutions;
- It identifies the constituent issues and arguments, and can help establish who and what the political actors and processes are at each stage;
- It can help establish whether further information, evidence or resources are needed to make a strong case, or build a convincing solution;
- Present issues – rather than apparent, future or past issues – are dealt with and identified;
- The process of analysis often helps build a shared sense of understanding, purpose and action.
Developing a Problem Tree Analysis |
Step By Step[3]The problem tree should be developed as a participatory group activity. 6 to 8 people is often a good group size. It is important to ensure that groups are structured in ways that enable particular viewpoints, especially those of the less powerful, to be expressed.[4]
The heart of the exercise is the discussion, debate and dialogue that is generated as factors are arranged and re-arranged, often forming sub-dividing roots and branches.[5] Identify the kind of knowledge learners will acquire:
Quick CheckWhen writing learning objective statements, ask yourself the following questions:
Job AidsDeveloping Learning Objectives |
Examples of Goals and Objectives |
The following documents contain examples of learning goals and objectives developed according to the instructions: |
General Examples of Goals and Objectives | General learning goals and objectives developed for different courses outside UNITAR. |
Learning Goal and Objectives: Urban Sanitation Course | Learning objectives developed for UNITAR course on Urban Sanitation. |
Learning Goal and Objectives: Democratic Governance Course | Learning objectives developed for UNITAR / UNDP course on Democratic Governance. |
References
- ↑ European Commission, « Aid Delivery Methods : Volume 1 Project Cycle Management Guidelines », March 2004.
- ↑ [1](22 October, 2009).
- ↑ European Commission, « Aid Delivery Methods : Volume 1 Project Cycle Management Guidelines », March 2004, and NZAID Tools, “Logical Framework Approach”, http://nzaidtools.nzaid.govt.nz/logical-framework-approach/annex-2-problem-tree-analysis (22 October, 2009)
- ↑ NZAID Tools, “Logical Framework Approach”, http://nzaidtools.nzaid.govt.nz/logical-framework-approach/annex-2-problem-tree-analysis (22 October, 2009)
- ↑ Overseas Development Institute (ODI), http://www.odi.org.uk/RAPID/Tools/Toolkits/Communication/Problem_tree.html (22 October, 2009)
- ↑ Hassel-Corbiell, Ribes, Developing Training Courses: a technical writer’s guide to instructional design and development, Learning Edge Publishing, 2006.