Difference between revisions of "Peer Assist"
Difference between revisions of "Peer Assist"
From Learning and training wiki
|
|
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | | |
| | | |
− | {{Tool|Organizing a Peer Assistl| __NOTOC__ | + | {{Tool|Organizing a Peer Assist| __NOTOC__ |
| == '''Steps'''== | | == '''Steps'''== |
| | | |
Revision as of 09:11, 29 August 2008
PEER ASSIST |
Knowledge management technique that is based on the assumption that for any given activity, someone else has done something that is at least broadly similar. According to this premise, a team or group needs to identify the right group of people, and then uses a systematic method to benefit from their insights/experience. If conducted effectively, peer assists can promote learning, and be used to strengthen mutual learning between people and groups within an organization. [1] |
Organizing a Peer Assist |
Steps
Before
- Choose participants from a common background, or an experienced team
- Participants should be given briefing materials in advance, so they have
time to prepare the meeting
- Give enough time for the meeting
- Appoint a facilitator
- Run the peer assist meeting
During
- Define the context and explain the purpose of the peer assist
- Discuss issues, needs, and expected outcomes of the problem
- Encourage participants to ask questions and bring out details of the situation
- Participants examine options to solve the problem
- Receive the participants feedback
- The facilitator records the solutions
- Write an action list of key lessons
After
- Explore the feedback of the team
- Explore options to solve the problem
- Develop a set of lessons learned for future actions
- Update participants with lessons learn
Facilitator's Role
The facilitator plays three main roles which are the follows:
Leadership role
- To focus on providing a direction to the group when the leader fails to fulfill their role
- To stimulate and encourage constructive debate between group members
- To support members of the group, helping them to bring information, and to build new ideas
- To participate when the group is interacting poorly or in the wrong direction, by promoting new discussion
- To promote team building in a cohesive, interactive, and productive way
Referee role
- To regulate and maintain order of the group discussion, discouraging participants from talking at the same time
- To protect members, and ensure that all contributions to the discussion are treated equally
- To deal with problems, and to control people within the group, allowing everyone to participate freely
- To manage the time, and adhere to the meeting timetable ensuring completion of the agenda
Neutral role
- The facilitator is neutral, and pragmatic, because he takes a detached look at the discussion
- He encourages feedback, promoting discussion of each point of the meeting. [2]
Print the Document
|
References
- ↑ www.epistemics.co.uk (19 April 2008), www.odi.org.uk (19 April 2008)
- ↑ www.daretoshare.ch (29 August 2008), www.odi.org.uk (29 August 2008), www.w3j.com (29 August 2008), www.foodsec.org (29 August 2008), wikis.bellanet.org (29 August 2008)