Difference between revisions of "Meta-Evaluation"
From Learning and training wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Term|META-EVALUATION|An evaluation that aggregates the findings from a series of evaluations. It can be considered as an expert review of one or more evaluations against professional quality standards.<ref>Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp 203. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.</ref> A meta-evaluation can also entail the evaluation of evaluators to ensure the integrity of their work and adherence to good practices in evaluation.<ref>[http://um.dk/en Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Danida.Meta-Evaluation Private and Business Sector Development Interventions.pp.3. Copenhagen, 2004.]</ref>}} | + | {{Term|META-EVALUATION|An evaluation that aggregates the [[Finding|findings]] from a series of [[Evaluation|evaluations]]. It can be considered as an expert review of one or more evaluations against professional [[Quality Standards|quality standards]].<ref>Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp 203. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.</ref> A meta-evaluation can also entail the evaluation of [[Evaluator|evaluators]] to ensure the integrity of their work and adherence to good practices in evaluation.<ref>[http://um.dk/en Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Danida.Meta-Evaluation Private and Business Sector Development Interventions.pp.3. Copenhagen, 2004.]</ref>}} |
Latest revision as of 10:18, 26 July 2011
 META-EVALUATION |
| An evaluation that aggregates the findings from a series of evaluations. It can be considered as an expert review of one or more evaluations against professional quality standards.[1] A meta-evaluation can also entail the evaluation of evaluators to ensure the integrity of their work and adherence to good practices in evaluation.[2] |
References
- ↑ Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp 203. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.
- ↑ Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Danida.Meta-Evaluation Private and Business Sector Development Interventions.pp.3. Copenhagen, 2004.