Difference between revisions of "Cognitive Load"
From Learning and training wiki
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#:*The information provided to learners must be carefully selected, avoiding overwhelming the working memory | #:*The information provided to learners must be carefully selected, avoiding overwhelming the working memory | ||
− | #Identify: | + | ##Identify: |
#:*What is necessary to know to meet the learning objectives | #:*What is necessary to know to meet the learning objectives | ||
#:*The compulsory study materials required to meet the learning objectives | #:*The compulsory study materials required to meet the learning objectives |
Revision as of 11:22, 13 April 2010
COGNITIVE LOAD |
The amount of information that loads the working memory in a learning process. The working memory is the part of the brain that provides temporary storage for new information. It is responsible for processing the information and then integrating it in the long-term memory. The working memory has limited capacity. It can only process and select little information to be integrated in the long-term memory. It is impossible to control what information is selected for processing and long-term storage.
|
Considering the cognitive load while designing a course |
General Guidelines
Job AidConsidering the cognitive load while designing a course |
References
- ↑ Wikipedia (1 March 2010), edutechwiki (2 March 2010), edtechdev.wordpress.com (2 March 2010), www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (18 March 2010), Cliff Atkinson, “The science of Making Your PowerPoint Memorable: Q&A with Nelson Cowan”, www.beyondbulletpoints.com (June 2004), George A. Miller, The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information”, Psychological Review 63, 81-97 (1956)
- ↑ Cliff Atkinson, “The science of Making Your PowerPoint Memorable: Q&A with Nelson Cowan”, www.beyondbulletpoints.com (June 2004), George A. Miller, The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information”, Psychological Review 63, 81-97 (1956)