Difference between revisions of "Stakeholder Analysis"

Revision as of 13:38, 2 September 2008

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS

The identification of a project's key stakeholders, an assessment of their interests and the ways in which those interests affect project riskiness and viability. A basic premise behind stakeholder analysis is that different groups have different concerns, capacities and interests, and that these need to be explicitly understood and recognized in the process of problem identification, objective setting and strategy selection. The key questions asked by stakeholder analysis are "Whose problems or opportunities are being analyzed" and "Who will benefit or loose-out, and how, from a proposed project intervention"? The ultimate aim being to help maximize the social, economic and institutional benefits of a project to target groups and ultimate beneficiaries, and to minimze its potential negative impacts, including staheholder conflicts. A stakeholder analysis develops a strategic view of the social environment in which a project will be implemented, thus it is usually the first step in building the relationships needed for the success of a project. A stakeholder analysis can be undertaken throughout all the stages of a project cycle. It can be used to:

Identify and define the characteristics of key stakeholders;
Draw out the interests of stakeholders in relation to the problems that the project is seeking to address;
Identify conflicts of interests between stakeholders;
Help to identify relations between stakeholders that may enable "coalitions" of project sponsorship, ownership and cooperation;
Assess the capacity of different stakeholders and stakeholder groups to participate;

In development projects, a key purpose of stakeholders analysis is to understand and address distributional concerns, particularly in the constext of effectively the needs of vulnerable groups. ^[1]

Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis

Step by Step

Identifying major stakeholder groups:
- Identify the general development of the project as it is expected to be held.
- Identify the groups that have a significant interest in the project (Stakeholders), they can be individuals, groups, communities, organizations, etc.
- Define the interests and agenda of the agency directing the exercise. This can be redressed later in the process by allowing the inclusion of more stakeholders as their interest comes to light.
Determining interests, importance and influence:
- Investigate roles, relative power and capacity to participate in the project, in order to draw out key interests for each stakeholder group in the initial list. Key questions could include:
  - What are the stakeholder expectations on the project?
  - What benefits are there likely to be for stakeholders?
  - What resources are the stakeholders likely to commit (or avoid committing) to the project?
  - What other interests does the stakeholder have that may conflict with the project?
  - How does the stakeholder regard others on the list?
- Assess the influence and importance of each stakeholder on the project.
  Influence refers to how powerful a stakeholder is; importance refers to those stakeholders whose problems, needs and interests coincide with the aims of the project. Also the relationship between stakeholders has to be observed, to outline the extent of cooperation and or conflict between them. This information should be organized in a Matrix, that is a useful tool to conduct a more effective analysis.
Establishing strategies for involvement:
- Interpret the findings of the previous analysis and incorporate relevant information in the project design, in order to plan strategies
- Manage and coordinate arrangements appropriately to promote stakeholder ownership, participation, and conflicts of interest
- Partnerships should be flexible and designed to grow. Where the stakeholder is a group rather than an individual, you may need to decide whether all in the group participate or only representatives of the group. ^[2]

Creating the Matrix

This is where stakeholders are plotted against different variables, in particular the elements taken into consideration are the importance of each stakeholder and his influence in the project.

File:Trial.jpg

In the boxes A,B,C,D the stakeholder should be listed considering their relevance as influence as follows:

Box A
These are stakeholders with a medium to high degree of influence on the project, who are also of medium/high importance for its success. This implies that the implementing organization will need to construct good working relationships with these stakeholders, to ensure an effective coalition of support for the project. Examples might be the senior officials and politicians or trade unions.
Box B
These are stakeholders of medium or high importance to the success of the project, but with low or not known influence. This implies that they will require special initiatives if their interests are to be protected. An example may be traditionally marginalised groups (e.g. Indigenous people, youth, seniors), who might be beneficiaries of a new service, but who have little ‘voice’ in its development.
Box C
These are stakeholders with medium to high influence, who can therefore affect the project outcomes, but whose interests are not necessarily aligned with the overall goals of the project. They might be financial administrators, who can exercise considerable discretion over funding disbursements. This conclusion implies that these stakeholders may be a source of significant risk, and they will need careful monitoring and management.
Box D
The stakeholders in this box, with low or unknown influence on, or importance to the project objectives, may require limited monitoring or evaluation, but are of low priority ^[3]

Job Aid

References

↑ www.landcareresearch.co.nz (23 July 2008), www.panda.org (23 July 2008); Aid Delivery Methods - Project Cycle Management Guidelines, European Commission, 2004
↑ www.euforic.org (14 August 2008), www.landcarersearch.co.nz (14 August 2008), www.who.int (14 August 2008), Project Cycle Management Guidelines, European Commission, 2004
↑ www.dse.vic.gov.au (14 August 2008)

[1] www.landcareresearch.co.nz (23 July 2008), www.panda.org (23 July 2008); Aid Delivery Methods - Project Cycle Management Guidelines, European Commission, 2004

[2] www.euforic.org (14 August 2008), www.landcarersearch.co.nz (14 August 2008), www.who.int (14 August 2008), Project Cycle Management Guidelines, European Commission, 2004

[3] www.dse.vic.gov.au (14 August 2008)

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 *'''Box A'''
-*: These are stakeholders with a high degree of influence on the project, who are also of high importance for its success. This implies that the implementing organization will need to construct good working relationships with these stakeholders, to ensure an effective coalition of support for the project. Examples might be the senior officials and politicians or trade unions.
+*: These are stakeholders with a medium to high degree of influence on the project, who are also of medium/high importance for its success. This implies that the implementing organization will need to construct good working relationships with these stakeholders, to ensure an effective coalition of support for the project. Examples might be the senior officials and politicians or trade unions.
 *'''Box B'''
-*:These are stakeholders of high importance to the success of the project, but with low influence. This implies that they will require special initiatives if their interests are to be protected. An example may be traditionally marginalised groups (e.g. Indigenous people, youth, seniors), who might be beneficiaries of a new service, but who have little ‘voice’ in its development.
+*:These are stakeholders of medium or high importance to the success of the project, but with low or not known influence. This implies that they will require special initiatives if their interests are to be protected. An example may be traditionally marginalised groups (e.g. Indigenous people, youth, seniors), who might be beneficiaries of a new service, but who have little ‘voice’ in its development.
 *'''Box C'''
-*:These are stakeholders with high influence, who can therefore affect the project outcomes, but whose interests are not necessarily aligned with the overall goals of the project. They might be financial administrators, who can exercise considerable discretion over funding disbursements. This conclusion implies that these stakeholders may be a source of significant risk, and they will need careful monitoring and management.
+*:These are stakeholders with medium to high influence, who can therefore affect the project outcomes, but whose interests are not necessarily aligned with the overall goals of the project. They might be financial administrators, who can exercise considerable discretion over funding disbursements. This conclusion implies that these stakeholders may be a source of significant risk, and they will need careful monitoring and management.
 *'''Box D'''
-*:The stakeholders in this box, with low influence on, or importance to the project objectives, may require limited monitoring or evaluation, but are of low priority <ref>[http://www.dse.vic.gov.au www.dse.vic.gov.au]  (14 August 2008)</ref>
+*:The stakeholders in this box, with low or unknown influence on, or importance to the project objectives, may require limited monitoring or evaluation, but are of low priority <ref>[http://www.dse.vic.gov.au www.dse.vic.gov.au]  (14 August 2008)</ref>

Navigation

Search

Toolbox

LANGUAGES