Difference between revisions of "Summative Evaluation"

Difference between revisions of "Summative Evaluation"

From Learning and training wiki

Share/Save/Bookmark
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Term|SUMMATIVE EVALUATION|Gathering of information at the conclusion of a course or a program to improve learning or to meet accountability demands. When used for improvement, impacts the next [[cohort|cohort]] of learners taking the course or program, since the course will be changed on the basis of previous cohort evaluation.<ref>[http://www.aacu.org www.aacu.org] (25 March 2008)</ref>.The conduction of a summative evaluation requires the identification of specific characteristics related to the kind of information provided, the timing  and the aim - the what, where and why one can find in the [[#Formative versus Summative Evaluation|Formative versus Summative Evaluation table]]. Ideally, the two modes are complementary. Also, as noted in the table below, the process of formative evaluation may be an important component in summative evaluation.<ref>[http://www.sru.edu www.sru.edu] (5 November 2008)</ref>. See also: [[Evaluation]], [[Formative Evaluation]]
+
{{Term|SUMMATIVE EVALUATION|Is intended to provide information about the [[Merit|merit]], worth and [[Impact|impact]] of a project.<ref>[http://www.un.org/Depts/oios/mecd/mecd_glossary/index.htm Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS). Monitoring, Evaluation and Consulting Division, 2006.]</ref> Summative evaluation is usually conducted at the end  of a programme or project to determine if anticipated [[Result|results]] were achieved. Summative evaluations include [[Impact Evaluation|impact evaluations]], cost-effectiveness investigations and [[Case study|case studies]].<ref>Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp.10. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.</ref>
  
 +
 +
Gathering of information at the conclusion of a course or a program to improve learning or to meet accountability demands. When used for improvement, impacts the next [[cohort|cohort]] of learners taking the course or program, since the course will be changed on the basis of previous cohort evaluation.<ref>[http://www.aacu.org www.aacu.org] (25 March 2008)</ref>.The conduction of a summative evaluation requires the identification of specific characteristics related to the kind of information provided, the timing  and the aim - the what, where and why one can find in the [[#Formative versus Summative Evaluation|Formative versus Summative Evaluation table]]. Ideally, the two modes are complementary. Also, as noted in the table below, the process of formative evaluation may be an important component in summative evaluation.<ref>[http://www.sru.edu www.sru.edu] (5 November 2008)</ref>. See also: [[Evaluation]], [[Formative Evaluation]], [[Writing Multiple Choice Questions]]
 
=='''Formative versus Summative Evaluation'''==
 
=='''Formative versus Summative Evaluation'''==
  
Line 13: Line 15:
 
Below you have a list of selected websites where you can find additional information:}}
 
Below you have a list of selected websites where you can find additional information:}}
  
{|border=1
+
{|border=1; width= 100%
 +
|-
 
!Link
 
!Link
 
!Content
 
!Content
 
|-
 
|-
|[http://www.gmbperformance.com/downloads/SummativeEvaluationGuidelines.pdf  www.gmbperformance.com]
+
|[http://www.gmbperformance.com/downloads/SummativeEvaluationGuidelines.pdf  The Summative Evaluation Guide]
 
|A guide for conducting summative evaluation.
 
|A guide for conducting summative evaluation.
 
|-
 
|-
|[http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/Literacy/ImplementALiteracyProgram/HowToDoSummativeTrainingEvalua.htm www.sil.org]
+
|[http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/Literacy/ImplementALiteracyProgram/HowToDoSummativeTrainingEvalua.htm How to do summative training evaluation]
|How to do a summative evaluation: objectives and steps.
+
|Objectives and steps of summative evaluations.
 
|-
 
|-
|[http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intreval.htm www.socialresearchmethods.org]
+
|[http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intreval.htm Introduction to Evaluation]
|Different types of summative evaluation, and a few evaluation questions and methods.
+
|Different types of summative evaluation, and a few evaluation questions and methods.  
 
|}
 
|}
  

Latest revision as of 17:52, 31 October 2014

Term2.png SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
Is intended to provide information about the merit, worth and impact of a project.[1] Summative evaluation is usually conducted at the end of a programme or project to determine if anticipated results were achieved. Summative evaluations include impact evaluations, cost-effectiveness investigations and case studies.[2]


Gathering of information at the conclusion of a course or a program to improve learning or to meet accountability demands. When used for improvement, impacts the next cohort of learners taking the course or program, since the course will be changed on the basis of previous cohort evaluation.[3].The conduction of a summative evaluation requires the identification of specific characteristics related to the kind of information provided, the timing and the aim - the what, where and why one can find in the Formative versus Summative Evaluation table. Ideally, the two modes are complementary. Also, as noted in the table below, the process of formative evaluation may be an important component in summative evaluation.[4]. See also: Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Writing Multiple Choice Questions

Formative versus Summative Evaluation

Formative vs Summative Evaluation.png


Link icon.png Web Resources
Below you have a list of selected websites where you can find additional information:
Link Content
The Summative Evaluation Guide A guide for conducting summative evaluation.
How to do summative training evaluation Objectives and steps of summative evaluations.
Introduction to Evaluation Different types of summative evaluation, and a few evaluation questions and methods.



References

  1. Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS). Monitoring, Evaluation and Consulting Division, 2006.
  2. Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp.10. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.
  3. www.aacu.org (25 March 2008)
  4. www.sru.edu (5 November 2008)