Difference between revisions of "After Action Review"
From Learning and training wiki
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Organize the meeting right after the event'''. After Action Reviews should be conducted as soon as possible after the event took place, in order to have fresh memories of it, and learning can be applied immediately. | *'''Organize the meeting right after the event'''. After Action Reviews should be conducted as soon as possible after the event took place, in order to have fresh memories of it, and learning can be applied immediately. | ||
*'''Build a climate of trust'''. The ideal climate for an After Action Review is one of trust, openness and commitment to learning. AARs are learning events, not critiques, and so should not be treated as performance evaluation. During AAR the hierarchic organization should be excluded, so that junior members can feel free to comment the seniors’ actions. | *'''Build a climate of trust'''. The ideal climate for an After Action Review is one of trust, openness and commitment to learning. AARs are learning events, not critiques, and so should not be treated as performance evaluation. During AAR the hierarchic organization should be excluded, so that junior members can feel free to comment the seniors’ actions. | ||
− | *'''Recruit a facilitator'''. Ideally the [[facilitator]] should by someone who has not taken part in the project so that he/she can remain objective | + | *'''Recruit a facilitator'''. Ideally the [[facilitator]] should by someone who has not taken part in the project so that he/she can remain objective. |
'''During the Meeting''' | '''During the Meeting''' |
Revision as of 14:45, 15 September 2008
AFTER ACTION REVIEW |
Briefing or analysis following the completion of an activity to allow employees and leaders to see whether anything could have or should have been done differently. It is a process developed to help teams to learn quickly from their successes (good practices) and failures (lessons learned) and share their learning with other teams and it should be performed after each identifiable event or milestone, and becomes a live learning process to help support learning organizations. It involves conducting a professional structured and facilitated discussion after a task or project has been completed to review what should have happened, what actually happened and why it happened; this allows participants to learn how to sustain strengths and improve on weaknesses in subsequent tasks or projects.[1] See also: Action Review |
Orginizing an After Action Review |
Step by StepBefore the Meeting
During the Meeting
After the Meeting
Facilitator's RoleThe facilitator plays three main roles which are the follows: Leadership role
Referee role
Neutral role
Job Aids |
References
- ↑ www.library.nhs.uk(14 April 2008), Wikipedia (14 April 2008), www.au.af.mil (14 April 2008)
- ↑ http://www.library.nhs.uk (14 August 2008) , www.mindtools.com (28 August 2008), www.daretoshare.com (28 August 2008), www.work911.com (28 August 2008)