|
|
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | |'''Steps'''|| | | |'''Steps'''|| |
| | |- style="border:1px solid #D87A35;background:white;color:black;" | | |- style="border:1px solid #D87A35;background:white;color:black;" |
| − | |'''Facilitator role''' || '''Leadership role''' | + | |'''[[Facilitator|Facilitator]] role''' || '''Leadership role''' |
| | * To focus on providing a direction to the group when the leader fails to fulfill their role | | * To focus on providing a direction to the group when the leader fails to fulfill their role |
| | *To stimulate and encourage constructive debate between group members | | *To stimulate and encourage constructive debate between group members |
Revision as of 12:43, 18 August 2008
 AFTER ACTION REVIEW |
|
Steps for an after action review: [1]
| Charasteristics
|
Content
|
| Definition
|
After Action Review.
|
| Steps |
|
| Facilitator role |
Leadership role
- To focus on providing a direction to the group when the leader fails to fulfill their role
- To stimulate and encourage constructive debate between group members
- To support members of the group, helping them to bring information, and to build new ideas
- To participate when the group is interacting poorly or in the wrong direction, by promoting new discussion
- To promote team building in a cohesive, interactive, and productive way
Referee role
- To regulate and maintain order of the group discussion, discouraging participants from talking at the same time
- To protect members, and ensure that all contributions to the discussion are treated equally
- To deal with problems, and to control people within the group, allowing everyone to participate freely
- To manage the time, and adhere to the meeting timetable ensuring completion of the agenda
Neutral role
- The facilitator is neutral, and pragmatic, because he takes a detached look at the discussion
- He encourages feedback, to promote discussion of each point of the meeting
|
|
Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
AFTER ACTION REVIEW