Difference between revisions of "Meta-Evaluation"

Difference between revisions of "Meta-Evaluation"

From Learning and training wiki

Share/Save/Bookmark
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Term|META-EVALUATION|An evaluation that aggregates the findings from a series of evaluations. It can be considered as an expert review of one or more evaluations against profes...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Term|META-EVALUATION|An evaluation that aggregates the findings from a series of evaluations. It can be considered as an expert review of one or more evaluations against professional quality standards.<ref>Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp 168. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.</ref> A meta-evaluation can also entail the evaluation of evaluators to ensure the integrity of their work and adherence to good practices in evaluation.<ref>[http://um.dk/en Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Danida.Meta-Evaluation Private and Business Sector Development Interventions.pp.3. Copenhagen, 2004.]</ref>}}
+
{{Term|META-EVALUATION|An evaluation that aggregates the findings from a series of evaluations. It can be considered as an expert review of one or more evaluations against professional quality standards.<ref>Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp 203. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.</ref> A meta-evaluation can also entail the evaluation of evaluators to ensure the integrity of their work and adherence to good practices in evaluation.<ref>[http://um.dk/en Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Danida.Meta-Evaluation Private and Business Sector Development Interventions.pp.3. Copenhagen, 2004.]</ref>}}
  
  

Revision as of 14:23, 19 July 2011

Term2.png META-EVALUATION
An evaluation that aggregates the findings from a series of evaluations. It can be considered as an expert review of one or more evaluations against professional quality standards.[1] A meta-evaluation can also entail the evaluation of evaluators to ensure the integrity of their work and adherence to good practices in evaluation.[2]



References

  1. Imas Linda G. Morra, Rist C. Ray. The Road To Results; Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations pp 203. The World Bank, Washington DC, 2009.
  2. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Danida.Meta-Evaluation Private and Business Sector Development Interventions.pp.3. Copenhagen, 2004.